Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Fast fashion and sustainability Week 6
Week 6
The debate of sustainability vs fast fashion is something close to my own personal design philosophy, I want to create quality and accountability, I want to be able to reach my consumer, have pride in my work and my designs, I think that to create the right environment for sustainability is to create garments that engage the consumer yet, slowly move from staples of cotton and polyester into new technologies which wont alienate the consumer. Theirs a stigma that comes with sustainability that can’t just be ignored, it isn’t just hessian shacks and hippie garb, it’s beautiful and different, the feel of bamboo vs. cotton is amazing its soft and maluable its easy to clean, yet the pros seem to be weighed down by the FALSE con’s voiced throughout the design world.
These designers have proved this:
http://www.stique.com/
http://www.leanimal.com/#/home
http://www.slingfings.com.au/
http://www.asiaticakc.com/clothing.html
http://www.lindaloudermilk.com/
http://www.freidesigns.com/
http://www.velvetleafclothing.com/HOME.html
I think the serious ramifications of the industries current path is catastrophic, with a slight tweaking of current practise we as young designers could completely reinvent the industry, we should see it as a scope for creativity not a burden like many do.
After todays debate, I've chosen to keep this post rather loose, a little bit wound up this is one topic that really IRKS me.
Men’s wear Week 5
Men’s wear
Week 5
The discussion with Jenny was really informative, and the source material really outlined the constraints of men’s fashion. Almost depressing the utilitarian aspects, yet interesting how they have the LBD equivalent in the Bomber/Military jacket. Men’s flamboyancy is show through the masculine edge of military inspired clothing, seems logical when you think about it. This has filtered through to women’s fashion to, how we seem to pick up the slack they drop.
The class exercise was HILARIOUS fun, looking into the impracticalities, international innovations from
Steampunk Moves Between 2 Worlds
Interesting New York Fashion Style article
New Technology - Lunar Design
http://www.lunar.com/portfolio/fashion/index.html
Gender and sexuality Week 4
Gender and sexuality
Week 4
Some quotes from the text that really got the ball rolling for me; it was hard for me not to rip straight into a MASSIVE rant, so I created a little infrastructure to address the main highlight text in my resource book:
“Elegance does not necessarily increase sexual appeal – it may on the contrary be forbidding – and, paradoxically, exaggerated masculinity or femininity may be less than a sexual presence tinged with ambiguity…”
&
“Men impose punishing restrictions on women…”
It seems in institutions away from CIT men dominate the fashion world, however the independent strong and very intelligent women in our course seem to be an unusual population and paradox when compared to the international “Taste makers” of labels who in the majority are men. The super labels male designers groom and prime women into a image of beauty they themselves create despite being almost completely detached from the complexity of modern issues and ideals that have emerged from contemporary society, it seems these men are SO detached and numb to their outside world that they are haemorrhaging consumers. Still designing for women 25 – 35… in the 1940’s. We're crafted into the image of women through men, who want us to be them??? That's how i see it as.
“Chaos of androgyny”
My designs embrace a masculine edge, I love challenging opreconceived notions of what is female, what is male and what does she have the balls to wear I love challenging, and making the demographic uncomfortable, creating a aesthetic that many women identify and embrace, however boyish it is playing with the back and forth with genders.
“Change characters. How many fashions can you play?”
this one really got me, even in 1984, Vogue was categorising complex women into pigeon holes that they didn’t fit nor belong. It’s the mentality and restrictions that these magazines create that have completely skewed the everyday women into believing her individuality is justified, yet in reality is a marketed fabrication from these infrastructures.
Subcultures and individualism: Harajuku Week 2 and 3
Subcultures and individualism: Harajuku
Week 2 and 3
Subculture and individualism was really interesting to deconstruct and discuss, how we isolated the trends and fads that emerge and subside:
“The cycle leading from opposition to diffusion, from resistance to incorporation encloses watch successive subculture…”
The punks being a prime example, how “catwoman,” the robot and vogue dancers, created enough interest to allow people to adapt, mimic and eventually mainstream their “anti establishment” and “we’re into chaos, not music” ideologies. Eventually the underworlds impact is reversed and flipped, as it emerges from the everyday, being marketed to the public in which saw it as a nuisance, the anti establishment being morphed into a very desirable niche.
The Sex Pistols and their independence from the media, is what made them so interesting to the public, because they we’re abrasive, they created such a frenzy in the youth culture, and it was a movement in which didn’t need nor respond to wealth as it arise from the derelict lower classes. Clothes pegs, garbage bags and deconstruction became their canvas to express themselves.
This would be really interesting to play with, the ideology of subcultures, the exclusivity that transcends financial constraints. Consumer research and dynamics in which focus on certain imagery and marketing that evokes a status and loyalty. For me it would being a stand alone against the mass market, everyone seems to think the most extreme alternative is the most effective, but creating a point of difference that just tripped up, tricked, a slight variable from your competition would be more effective, we forget that the fashion and design world is so set, we NEED TO FORCE a reimagining and if a few slightly pull the preconceived notions, ever so slightly, we will have more of an impact overall. Almost retraining our consumer, engaging them in a less threatening way, allowing them to feel more engaged.

